OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments
Authors' conclusion
We identified 220 candidate instruments used in the SDM literature amongst people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Our classification of instruments showed evidence gaps and inconsistent reporting of measurement properties.
Study context
- Population
- Shared decision making (SDM) studies in adults or children with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases or their important others99 eligible studies
- Outcome
- Candidate instruments for an OMERACT Core Outcome Measurement Set for SDM, with their measurement properties
Methodological detailsPRISMA-ScR, five databases, paired independent reviewers, adapted Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) table
- PRISMA-ScR
- Five databases
- Paired independent reviewers
- Adapted SOMP table
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Candidate SDM measurement instruments
- Citations found
- 14,464
- Full text articles read
- 239
- Eligible studies included
- 99
- Potential candidate instruments identified
- 220
- Decisional Conflict Scale (traditional and low literacy versions), studies
- 38
- Hip/Knee-Decision Quality Instrument, studies
- 20
- Decision Regret Scale, studies
- 9
- Preparation for Decision Making Scale, studies
- 8
- CollaboRATE, studies
- 8
- Candidate instruments with any measurement properties reported
- 44 (20%)
- Of these, matched ≥1 of the 7-criteria adapted SOMP table
- 57%
Original publication
OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Published 16 December 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →