Systemic sclerosis & Raynaud's

Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma: clinical and serological features and relationship with other cutaneous subsets in a large series of patients from the national registry ‘SPRING’ of the Italian Society for Rheumatology

RMD OpenPublished Cross-sectional study

An erratum to this article was published (RMD Open, Jun 2023 ↗)

Authors' conclusion

The ssSSc is a quite rare disease variant characterised by clinico-serological features comparable to lcSSc, but significantly different from dcSSc. Overall, longer RP duration, low percentages of DPS and peripheral microvascular abnormalities, and increased anti-centromere seropositivity distinguish ssSSc.

Study context

Population
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients from the Italian Systemic sclerosis PRogression INvestiGation registry
Participants
1,808 patients
Exposure
Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma (ssSSc) vs lcSSc and dcSSc
  • ssSScn = 61
Outcome
Demographic, clinical and laboratory features of ssSSc
Methodological detailsmulticentre, national registry (SPRING)
  • Multicentre
  • National registry (SPRING)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prevalence of ssSSc among SSc patients
GroupValueF/M
ssSSc3.4%19/1

ssSSc

Value3.4%
F/M19/1

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Anticentromere positivity — ssSSc vs dcSSc

P < 0.001

Antitopoisomerase positivity — ssSSc vs dcSSc

P < 0.001

OutcomessSSclcSScdcSScP value
Time from RP onset to diagnosisLonger in ssSSc than lcSSc and dcSSc3 (IQR 1–16.5) years2 (IQR 0–7) years1 (IQR 0–3) yearP < 0.001
Digital pitting scars, ssSSc vs lcSSc19.7%42%— not stated in the abstractP = 0.01
Digital ulcers, ssSSc vs dcSSc6.6%— not stated in the abstract35.7%P < 0.001
Oesophageal involvement, ssSSc vs dcSSc46.2%— not stated in the abstract63.5%P = 0.009
DLCO, ssSSc vs dcSScMean72.2 (SD 19.6)— not stated in the abstract62.4 (SD 22.8)P = 0.009
FVC, ssSSc vs dcSScMean105.6 (SD 21.7)— not stated in the abstract89.2 (SD 20.9)P < 0.001
Videocapillaroscopic late pattern, ssSSc vs dcSSc8.6%— not stated in the abstract47.6%P < 0.001

— not stated in the abstract

Digital pitting scars, ssSSc vs lcSSc

Clinical ssSSc phenotype otherwise comparable to lcSSc

Anticentromere positivity

ssSSc comparable to lcSSc

Antitopoisomerase positivity

ssSSc comparable to lcSSc

Original publication

Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma: clinical and serological features and relationship with other cutaneous subsets in a large series of patients from the national registry ‘SPRING’ of the Italian Society for Rheumatology. RMD Open. Published 3 March 2023. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002890

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.