Sjögren's disease & overlap diseases
Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous iscalimab (CFZ533) in two distinct populations of patients with Sjögren's disease (TWINSS): week 24 results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-ranging study
Authors' conclusion
The study met the primary objective of demonstrating a significant dose-response relationship with iscalimab in terms of disease activity at week 24.
Study context
- Population
- Adults with SjD fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria; cohort 1: EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) ≥5 and EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) ≥5; cohort 2: ESSDAI <5, ESSPRI (dryness or fatigue) ≥5 and Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life score ≥30460 screened
- Participants
- 44 / 43 / 43 / 43 / 50 / 50
- Comparison
- Subcutaneous iscalimab (anti-CD40) 150 mg, 300 mg or 600 mg vs placebo (cohort 1); iscalimab 600 mg vs placebo (cohort 2)
- Iscalimab 150 mg (cohort 1)n = 44
- Iscalimab 300 mg (cohort 1)n = 43
- Iscalimab 600 mg (cohort 1)n = 43
- Placebo (cohort 1)n = 43reference
- Iscalimab 600 mg (cohort 2)n = 50
- Placebo (cohort 2)n = 50reference
- Primary endpoint
- Cohort 1: dose-response of iscalimab on change in ESSDAI from baseline (Multiple Comparison Procedure-Modelling (MCP-Mod)); cohort 2: effect of iscalimab 600 mg on ESSPRI
- Follow-up
- Week 24
Methodological detailsdouble-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b, dose-ranging, multicentre (71 sites, 23 countries), two cohorts
- Double-blind
- Placebo-controlled
- Phase 2b
- Dose-ranging
- Multicentre (71 sites, 23 countries)
- Two cohorts
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Cohort 1: placebo-adjusted change in ESSDAI from baseline
Each group vs placebo (cohort 1)LS mean difference (95% CI)P value
Iscalimab 150 mg (cohort 1)
−3.0(−4.9 to −1.1)
P = 0.0025Iscalimab 600 mg (cohort 1)
−2.9(−4.9 to −1.0)
P = 0.0037- Significant dose-response relationship in one of four models (Linlog model)
- one-sided p=0.0041
Further findings
| Outcome | LS mean change from baseline (points) (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-primary, cohort 2: placebo-adjusted change in ESSPRI from baseline · week 24Iscalimab 600 mg (cohort 2)vs Placebo (cohort 2)Trend towards improvement | −0.57 (−1.30 to 0.15) | P = 0.12 | |
| −2−101Difference, points (linear scale) |
Deaths · 24 weeks
- No deaths occurred
Safety
| Outcome | Values |
|---|---|
| Serious adverse events, cohort 1 · 24 weeks | Placebo (cohort 1) 2% · Iscalimab 150 mg (cohort 1) 2% · Iscalimab 300 mg (cohort 1) 7% · Iscalimab 600 mg (cohort 1) 9% |
| Serious adverse events, cohort 2 · 24 weeks | Iscalimab 600 mg (cohort 2) 4% · Placebo (cohort 2) 4% |
- Serious adverse events, cohort 1: 9 patients in cohort 1
Original publication
Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous iscalimab (CFZ533) in two distinct populations of patients with Sjögren's disease (TWINSS): week 24 results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-ranging study. Lancet. Published 31 July 2024. doi:10. 1016/ s0140-6736(24)01211-x
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →