Lupus & antiphospholipid syndrome

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) outperforms platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in SLE diagnosis and prognosis: an artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced meta-analysis of 12 850 patients with ethnicity-specific cut-offs

Lupus Sci MedPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis with development and validation of a machine learning model

Authors' conclusion

NLR outperforms PLR in SLE diagnosis and risk stratification, with validated cut-offs that vary significantly by ethnicity.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 years) meeting 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE, global SLE registries (Asia, Europe, North America, Africa); comparators healthy controls and non-SLE autoimmune diseases
Participants
12,850 adults50 studies
Comparison
NLR vs PLR as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in SLE
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) for active SLE (SLEDAI ≥6)
Methodological detailstwo-phase mixed-methods, PRISMA-compliant, XGBoost model with SHAP explainability, multicentre
  • Two-phase mixed-methods
  • PRISMA-compliant
  • XGBoost model with SHAP explainability
  • Multicentre

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Diagnostic accuracy for active SLE
GroupPooled AUCPooled sensitivityPooled specificity
NLR0.8578%82%
PLR0.7870%75%

Pooled AUC

NLR0.85
PLR0.78

Pooled sensitivity

NLR78%
PLR70%

Pooled specificity

NLR82%
PLR75%
  • NLR vs PLR: P = 0.02

Further pooled results

OutcomeNLRPLR
Prognosis: risk with elevated NLR (>3.5) and PLR (>185)
HR lupus nephritis2.11.8
HR cardiovascular events2.31.9
HR mortality3.12.1
  • Prognosis: risk with elevated NLR (>3.5) and PLR (>185): all p<0.01

Optimal NLR cut-offs by ethnicity

Asian
>3.1
Caucasian
>2.8
African
>3.4
  • Significant ethnic variations

AI model performance

AUC in training
0.87
AUC in validation
0.82
NLR top predictive feature, SHAP score
0.25

Original publication

NLR outperforms PLR in SLE diagnosis and prognosis: an AI-enhanced meta-analysis of 12 850 patients with ethnicity-specific cut-offs. Lupus Sci Med. Published 30 September 2025. doi:10.1136/lupus-2025-001696

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.