Lupus & antiphospholipid syndrome

Langerhans cells infiltration in lymph nodes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus Sci MedPublished Case-control study

Authors' conclusion

LC infiltration in the lymph nodes of patients with SLE is relatively common and should be carefully evaluated to prevent misdiagnosis.

Study context

Population
Newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with SLE, with and without lymphadenopathy
Participants
59 vs 81
Comparison
SLE with lymphadenopathy vs SLE without lymphadenopathy (LAP)
  • SLE-LAPn = 59
  • SLE without LAPn = 81reference
Outcome
Clinical features, SLE-LAP vs controls

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

SLE-LAP
Fever 64.4% vs 35.8%; P < 0.001
SLE-LAP
Anaemia 71.2% vs 42.0%; P < 0.001
SLE-LAP
Serous effusion 27.1% vs 11.1%; P = 0.015
SLE-LAP
Myositis 10.2% vs 1.2%; P = 0.045
SLE-LAP
Elevated CRP 44.1% vs 22.2%; P = 0.006

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Fever

P < 0.001

Anaemia

P < 0.001

Serous effusion

P = 0.015

Myositis

P = 0.045

Elevated CRP

P = 0.006

Autoantibodies, more frequent in the LAP group

Anti-Smith
37.3% vs 16.0%, p=0.004
aCL IgG
27.1% vs 11.1%, p=0.015
aCL IgM
42.4% vs 9.9%, p<0.001
aCL IgA
8.5% vs 0.0%, p=0.027

Distribution of Langerhans cells (LCs) on immunohistochemistry

Scattered
58.6%
Focal
41.4%

Presentation of patients with LC infiltration

Fever
72.4%
Anaemia
64.3%
Skin rashes
62.1%
Arthritis
62.1%

Clinical manifestations, LC-positive vs LC-negative

No significant differences in clinical manifestations between LC-positive and LC-negative patients

Original publication

Langerhans cells infiltration in lymph nodes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. Published 14 April 2025. doi:10.1136/lupus-2024-001474

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.