Systemic sclerosis & Raynaud's

Evaluation of particle-based multi-analyte technology for autoantibody detection in systemic sclerosis: concordance with conventional methods and clinical associations

Clin Exp RheumatolPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

These findings support the diagnostic and clinical utility of comprehensive serological profiling and the integration of PMAT into routine diagnostic workflows.

Study context

Population
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria, disease controls and healthy individuals
Participants
124 / 205 / 25
Comparison
PMAT vs conventional methods for SSc-associated autoantibodies
  • SScn = 124
  • Disease controlsn = 205
  • Healthy individualsn = 25
Outcome
Concordance of PMAT with conventional methods (chemiluminescence and ELISA) for SSc-associated autoantibodies

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Agreement of PMAT with established techniques

Anti-centromere autoantibodies (ACA), κ (excellent agreement)

0.95

Anti-Topo I, κ (excellent agreement)

0.95

Anti-RNApol III, κ (good agreement)

0.78

Further findings

Prevalence of autoantibodies (most prevalent)

ACA
54.0%
Anti-Topo I
21.0%
Anti-RNApol III
5.7%

Antibody–phenotype associations

ACA with lcSSc and absence of interstitial lung disease (ILD)
Anti-Topo I with dcSSc, ILD and scleroderma renal crisis
Anti-RNApol III with digital ulcers and calcinosis
Novel: PUF60 isoform 6 with severe ILD
Novel: PUF60 isoform 1 with sine scleroderma phenotype

Original publication

Evaluation of particle-based multi-analyte technology for autoantibody detection in systemic sclerosis: concordance with conventional methods and clinical associations. Clin Exp Rheumatol. Published 10 November 2025. doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/pfen40

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.