Spondyloarthritis & psoriatic arthritis

'Double target' ultrasound monitoring of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis

Clin Exp RheumatolPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

US was found sensitive for monitoring treatment response in PsA patients starting a biologic drug. Entheseal PD was less responsive than synovial PD, suggesting that enthesitis may represent a 'difficult-to-treat' domain in PsA.

Study context

Population
Consecutive psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with ultrasound (US) synovitis and US 'active' enthesitis starting a biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD)
Participants
30 patients
Exposure
Synovial power Doppler (PD) response vs entheseal PD response at target sites during bDMARD therapy
Outcome
US response of target joint and enthesis (synovitis composite score grade 0; PD response = PD 0 and/or reduction ≥2 PD grades)
Follow-up
3 and 6 months
Methodological detailsconsecutive patients, US 'double target' monitoring
  • Consecutive patients
  • US 'double target' monitoring

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

PD response, synovial vs entheseal · 3 months

P = 0.01

Synovitis composite score, synovial PD and entheseal PD showed significant responses at 3 and 6 months vs baseline
P < 0.01

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

PD response, synovial vs entheseal · 6 months

P = 0.02

Correlation of US synovitis responses with clinical responses

Correlated with DAPSA response
P < 0.01
Correlated with MDA response, composite score
P = 0.01
Correlated with MDA response, PD
P = 0.02

Original publication

'Double target' ultrasound monitoring of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. Published 30 June 2023. doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/mdjddz

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.