Vasculitis & polymyalgia rheumatica

Different giant cell arteritis phenotypes may present distinct types of ischaemic complications

Clin Exp RheumatolPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

The subtype of vascular US presentation influences the IC in GCA. US cranial-GCA patients more frequently present AION, while predominantly US LV-GCA more frequently exhibit non-AION IC.

Study context

Population
Clinically confirmed giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients referred to ultrasound (US) fast-track clinics at two centres; baseline US of cranial and extracranial arteries43 (22.9%) with ischaemic complications (IC)
Participants
188 participants
Exposure
Anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (AION) vs non-AION IC vs no IC: US phenotype
  • AIONn = 24
  • Non-AION ICn = 19
Outcome
Association of US presentation subtype with type of ischaemic complications (AION or non-AION pattern)
Follow-up
At diagnosis and in the following 3 months
Methodological detailsobservational, two centres, US fast-track clinics
  • Observational
  • Two centres
  • US fast-track clinics

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Ischaemic complications (IC)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

US cranial involvement · baseline — AION vs Non-AION IC · three-group comparison incl. without IC

P = 0.009

US LV-GCA signs · baseline — AION vs Non-AION IC · three-group comparison incl. without IC

P = 0.014

AION by polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) status

Previous PMR: less frequent AION
P = 0.049
Concomitant PMR symptoms at diagnosis: less frequent AION
P = 0.014

Original publication

Different giant cell arteritis phenotypes may present distinct types of ischaemic complications. Clin Exp Rheumatol. Published 21 May 2024. doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kexxzi

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.