Validity and Reliability of Four Parent/Patient–Reported Outcome Measures for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Remote Monitoring
Authors' conclusion
The 4 tested parent/child-reported outcomes showed good criterion validity and excellent reliability.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with JIA in the multinational Epidemiology Treatment and Outcome of Childhood Arthritis study
- Participants
- 8,643 vs 6,060
- Comparison
- Parents vs Patients
- Parentsn = 8,643
- Patientsn = 6,060
- Outcome
- Criterion validity (correlation with physician measures and cJADAS10) and reliability (ICC, 2 visits 7-14 days apart) of 4 parent/child-reported measures: pain, disease activity, morning stiffness duration, active joint count
Methodological detailsmultinational cohort, criterion validity, test–retest reliability (ICC)
- Multinational cohort
- Criterion validity
- Test–retest reliability (ICC)
Performance
As reported in the abstract
Correlation of tested measures with physician-reported measures: moderate
0.4-0.7
ICC, parents (n=442)
0.79 and 0.87
ICC, children (n=344)
0.81 and 0.88
Original publication
Validity and Reliability of Four Parent/Patient–Reported Outcome Measures for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Remote Monitoring. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Published 19 September 2022. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →