Rheumatoid arthritis

Three‐Year Results of Tapering Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor to Withdrawal Compared to Stable Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Sustained Remission: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Arthritis RheumatolPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

In contrast to those receiving stable TNFi treatment, a minority of patients with RA in remission tapering TNFi to withdrawal remained flare free over three years. There was no statistically significant difference in radiographic progression between the groups.

Study context

Population
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission for ≥12 months taking stable TNFi therapy80 completed 3-year follow-up
Participants
99 patients
Comparison
Tapering TNFi to withdrawal vs continued stable TNFi
Primary endpoint
Co-primary: flare-free survival and radiographic progression
Follow-up
3 years
Methodological detailsmulticentre, open-label, non-inferiority
  • Multicentre
  • Open-label
  • Non-inferiority

Primary result

Flare-free survival

HR for flare

9.4

95% CI 3.9–22.8

P < 0.0001

By group

Taperingvs Stable
HR for flare 9.4 (95% CI 3.9–22.8); P < 0.0001

As reported in the abstract

Further findings

OutcomeTaperingStableRisk difference (95% CI)P value
Co-primary: radiographic progression · 3 years15%8%6.7% (−7.1% to 20.5%)P = 0.3
Denominator4138

Safety

Adverse events

Original publication

Three‐Year Results of Tapering Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor to Withdrawal Compared to Stable Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Sustained Remission: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. Published 26 June 2025. doi:10.1002/art.43199

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.