Lupus & antiphospholipid syndrome

Performance of Risk Score Calculators in the Identification of Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

J RheumatolPublished Post hoc analysis of a case-control study

Authors' conclusion

The poor performance of conventional and even modified risk scores suggests a continued need for screening approaches, including CAC, to determine CV disease risk in the SLE patient population.

Study context

Population
Adult female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and matched controls, excluding those already meeting cardiology guidelines for recommended statin use128 SLE, 138 controls analysed
Participants
128 vs 138
Comparison
Atherosclerotic CV Disease (ASCVD) Risk Score vs SLECRISK score for identifying abnormal coronary artery calcification (CAC) in SLE and controls
  • SLEn = 128
  • Controlsn = 138reference
Primary endpoint
Performance (sensitivity, specificity) of cardiovascular (CV) risk tools (ASCVD Risk Score, SLECRISK) in identifying abnormal CAC
Methodological detailsdiagnostic performance, matched controls, logistic regression
  • Diagnostic performance
  • Matched controls
  • Logistic regression

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

GroupValueASCVD Risk Score sensitivitySLECRISK sensitivityMean ASCVD Risk Score
SLE31.3%15%30.8%2.2%
Controls12.3%17.6%1.9%

Value

SLE31.3%
Controls12.3%

ASCVD Risk Score sensitivity

SLE15%
Controls17.6%

SLECRISK sensitivity

SLE30.8%
Controls— not stated in the abstract

Mean ASCVD Risk Score

SLE2.2%
Controls1.9%
Specificity of ASCVD Risk Score and SLECRISK score for abnormal CAC
95-100%

Further findings

Characteristics of SLE patients with low ASCVD risk and abnormal CAC

More likely older, lower GFR, longer disease duration, higher insulin resistance, higher LDL and cholesterol

Original publication

Performance of Risk Score Calculators in the Identification of Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Rheumatol. Published 15 November 2025. doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0465

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.