Rheumatoid arthritis

Initial glucocorticoid bridging in rheumatoid arthritis: does it affect glucocorticoid use over time?

Ann Rheum DisPublished Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials

Pooled result · GC useResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 3.27 95% CI 1.06–10.08

Authors' conclusion

In randomised trials comparing GC bridging and no GC bridging, bridgers had a more rapid clinical improvement, fewer DMARD changes and similar late use of GC compared with non-bridgers.

Study context

Population
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the BeSt, CareRA and COBRA trialsBeSt, CareRA and COBRA trials
Participants
625 patients
Comparison
Initial glucocorticoids (GC) bridging vs no GC bridging
  • Bridgersn = 252
Outcome
GC use at 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline
Follow-up
12, 18 and 24 months
Methodological detailsmixed-effects regression analysis
  • Mixed-effects regression analysis

Pooled result

GC use · 12 months

Odds ratio

3.27

95% CI 1.06–10.08

Bridgersvs Non-bridgers
OR 3.27 (95% CI 1.06–10.08)

As reported in the abstract

Further pooled results

OutcomeDifference (mg) (95% CI)
Cumulative GC dose including bridging schedules · 24 months2406 (1403–3408)
OutcomeIRR (95% CI)
Number of DMARD changesSignificantly fewer changes in bridgers0.59 (0.38–0.94)

Cumulative GC dose excluding bridging period · 24 months

Cumulative doses were similar

Mean DAS28 over time

Mean DAS28 similar between groups; bridgers improved more rapidly in the first 6 months
P < 0.001

Original publication

Initial glucocorticoid bridging in rheumatoid arthritis: does it affect glucocorticoid use over time? Ann Rheum Dis. Published 2 January 2024. doi:10.1136/ard-2023-224270

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.