Osteoarthritis

Functional Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)Published Systematic review and content analysis

Authors' conclusion

Even though our search identified 50 specific PROMs, there remain gaps in content related to activity and participation coverage.

Study context

Population
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in hip or knee arthroplasty for adults with osteoarthritis (OA)449 studies
Outcome
Content validity of disease- or joint-specific functional PROMs, using the modified ICF core set for OA
Methodological detailsICF linking rules, two independent reviewers, modified ICF core set for OA
  • ICF linking rules
  • Two independent reviewers
  • Modified ICF core set for OA

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

ICF content coverage of PROMs

ICF categories of the modified OA core set not captured in any PROM

11

Most activity and participation coverage: KOOS and HOOS

36.7%

Original publication

Functional Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Published 13 October 2024. doi:10.1002/acr.25413

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.