Spondyloarthritis & psoriatic arthritis

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Chinese patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

RMD OpenPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

In Chinese patients with PsA, tofacitinib efficacy was greater than placebo (primary and secondary endpoints).

Study context

Population
Chinese patients with active (polyarthritic) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response to ≥1 csDMARD
Participants
136 vs 68
Comparison
Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily vs placebo
  • Tofacitinib 5 mg twice dailyn = 136
  • Placebon = 68reference
Primary endpoint
American College of Rheumatology (ACR50) response
Follow-up
M3
Methodological detailsphase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2:1 randomisation, switch to tofacitinib after M3 (blinded)
  • Phase 3
  • Double-blind
  • Placebo-controlled
  • 2:1 randomisation
  • Switch to tofacitinib after M3 (blinded)

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

P < 0.0001

Secondary outcomes

ACR20/ACR70/Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) responses, enthesitis and dactylitis resolution, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) reduction · M3

Responses and resolution rates higher and HAQ-DI reduction greater with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily vs placebo

Deaths

Death with placebo→tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (due to accident)
1

Safety

OutcomeTofacitinib 5 mg twice dailyPlacebo
AEs / serious AEs · M0-368.4%/0%75.0%/4.4%

Serious infection, herpes zoster, lung cancer · M0-6

Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily: serious infection
1
Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily: non-serious herpes zoster
1
Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily: lung cancer
1
Placebo→tofacitinib: serious infections
4
Placebo→tofacitinib: non-serious herpes zoster
1

Non-melanoma skin cancer, MACE, thromboembolism events

None reported
0

Original publication

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in Chinese patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. RMD Open. Published 31 January 2023. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002559

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.