Lupus & antiphospholipid syndrome
Predictors of damage accrual and its impact on health-related quality of life of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Independent validation of the damage index for antiphospholipid syndrome (DIAPS)
Authors' conclusion
This external validation of DIAPS reinforces the ability of the score to correlate with HR-QoL while also highlighting risk factors for HR-QoL impairment other than damage accrual.
Study context
- Population
- Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients (Sydney criteria) attending a Portuguese tertiary centreprimary APS, 75.9%
- Participants
- 108 patients
- Outcome
- Prevalence of damage (DIAPS≥1) and its impact on HR-QoL (EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))
Methodological detailssingle-centre (Portuguese tertiary centre), phone questionnaire, univariate and multivariate logistic regression
- Single-centre (Portuguese tertiary centre)
- Phone questionnaire
- Univariate and multivariate logistic regression
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Damage (DIAPS≥1)
Damage (DIAPS≥1) prevalence
48.2%
DIAPS, mean ± SD
3.08 ± 1.83
Neuropsychiatric domain most affected
24.2%
Peripheral vascular domain
20.3%
Observational data: associations, not effects.
Further findings
- Pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and usual activities domains most frequently impaired in both scales
- DIAPS domains correlated similarly with EQ-5D-3L and 5L individual domains
- Female sex, medical disorders, secondary APS and arterial presenting thrombosis increased risk of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) impairment
- Total DIAPS associated with higher odds of mobility, self-care and pain/discomfort impairment in both scales but lost independent risk in multivariable analysis
Original publication
Predictors of damage accrual and its impact on health-related quality of life of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Independent validation of the damage index for antiphospholipid syndrome (DIAPS). Lupus. Published 14 April 2024. doi:10. 1177/ 09612033241246360
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →