Spondyloarthritis & psoriatic arthritis

MRI-based synthetic CT: a new method for structural damage assessment in the spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis – a comparison with low-dose CT and radiography

Ann Rheum DisPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

With ldCT as reference standard, MRI-based sCT of the spine showed very high specificity and a sensitivity much higher than radiography, despite limited reader training.

Study context

Population
Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)
Participants
17 patients
Comparison
MRI-based synthetic CT vs radiography, with low-dose CT of the entire spine as reference standard
Outcome
Detection of spinal new bone formation (NBF), Canada-Denmark NBF assessment system
Methodological detailsreaders blinded to other imaging/clinical information, four readers, low-dose CT (ldCT) as reference standard
  • Readers blinded to other imaging/clinical information
  • Four readers
  • ldCT as reference standard

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Detection of NBF, entire spine (ldCT as reference standard)
Test or modelSensitivitySpecificity
Synthetic CT (sCT)0.67>0.95
Radiography0.13>0.95

Sensitivity

Synthetic CT (sCT)0.67
Radiography0.13

Specificity

Synthetic CT (sCT)>0.95
Radiography>0.95

Further findings

OutcomesCTRadiographyldCT
Mean NBF lesion scores (four readers)20937188
NBF at anterior vertebral corners, mean scores16635163
Detection of NBF, levels assessable on radiography (C2-T1 and T12-S1)
Sensitivity0.610.48— not stated in the abstract
Specificity>0.90>0.90— not stated in the abstract
Detection of NBF, facet joints
Sensitivity0.460.03— not stated in the abstract
Specificity>0.94>0.94— not stated in the abstract
Mean inter-reader agreement (kappa), all locationsBest for anterior corners
Kappa0.580.560.68

— not stated in the abstract

Original publication

MRI-based synthetic CT: a new method for structural damage assessment in the spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis – a comparison with low-dose CT and radiography. Ann Rheum Dis. Published 15 May 2024. doi:10.1136/ard-2023-225444

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.