Rheumatoid arthritis

Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 5-year data from the phase 3, randomised SELECT-COMPARE study

RMD OpenPublished Long-term extension of a randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

The safety profile of upadacitinib through 5 years was consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib, with no new safety risks. Clinical responses were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab at 5 years.

Study context

Population
Patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX
Comparison
Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily vs adalimumab 40 mg every other week, both with MTX
Methodological detailsSELECT-COMPARE, double-blind period to week 48, placebo- and active-controlled, rescue by week 26, non-responder imputation
  • SELECT-COMPARE
  • Double-blind period to week 48
  • Placebo- and active-controlled
  • Rescue by week 26
  • Non-responder imputation

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Clinical responses, randomised group (NRI) · 5 years (through week 264)
  • Numerically greater proportions randomised to upadacitinib vs adalimumab achieved clinical responses (non-responder imputation (NRI))
  • Non-responder imputation (NRI)

Further findings

OutcomeUpadacitinibAdalimumabP value
CDAI remission (≤2.8) · 5 years (through week 264)Upadacitinib vs Adalimumab · NRI24.6%18.7%nominal p=0.042
DAS28-CRP <2.6 · 5 years (through week 264)Upadacitinib vs Adalimumab · NRI31.8%23.2%nominal p=0.006

Radiographic progression · week 192

Numerically lower with continuous upadacitinib vs adalimumab

Safety

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) · through week 264

Rates of TEAEs generally similar with upadacitinib vs adalimumab
Numerically higher rates of herpes zoster, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, hepatic disorder and non-melanoma skin cancer with upadacitinib

Original publication

Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 5-year data from the phase 3, randomised SELECT-COMPARE study. RMD Open. Published 28 May 2024. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004007

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.