Osteoporosis & bone health

Diagnostic performance of lumbar computed tomography Hounsfield unit thresholds for osteoporosis and osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporos IntPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Authors' conclusion

Vertebral HU strongly discriminate normal from low BMD, providing clinically applicable pooled thresholds for opportunistic CT-based screening and perioperative risk assessment.

Study context

Population
Studies reporting vertebral Hounsfield units (HU) referenced to DXA or quantitative computed tomography (CT); databases searched to September 2025
Participants
5,016 participants20 studies
Comparison
Vertebral HU on routine CT vs DXA or quantitative CT as reference
Outcome
Unified HU cut-offs for identifying osteopenia and osteoporosis
Methodological detailsbivariate random-effects models, reconstructed 2 × 2 analyses
  • Bivariate random-effects models
  • Reconstructed 2 × 2 analyses

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Overall diagnostic performance of vertebral HU
AUC
0.865
Sensitivity
0.80
Specificity
0.83
Pooled osteopenia threshold, balanced
138.9 HU
Pooled osteopenia threshold, high
166.7 HU
Pooled osteopenia threshold, low
111.2 HU
Pooled osteoporosis threshold, balanced
104.6 HU
Pooled osteoporosis threshold, high
122.3 HU
Pooled osteoporosis threshold, low
86.8 HU

Further pooled results

OutcomeSMDP value
HU values, low BMD vs normal and osteoporosis vs non-osteoporotic boneLow BMD vs Normal−2.78P < 0.001
HU values, low BMD vs normal and osteoporosis vs non-osteoporotic boneOsteoporosis vs Non-osteoporotic bone−1.57P < 0.001

Relative risk for low bone mineral density (BMD) by HU

Decreasing HU associated with stepwise increases in relative risk for low BMD

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Diagnostic performance of lumbar computed tomography Hounsfield unit thresholds for osteoporosis and osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. Published 10 April 2026. doi:10.1007/s00198-026-07863-4

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.