Osteoporosis & bone health

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting osteoporosis using dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporos IntPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Authors' conclusion

This systematic review corroborates the accuracy of AI in OP diagnosis using dental images.

Study context

Population
Studies using AI models for osteoporosis diagnosis from dental radiographs12 studies in meta-analysis
Comparison
AI models (overall) vs Conventional algorithms vs Deep convolutional neural networks
Outcome
Sensitivity and specificity of AI models for OP diagnosis
Methodological detailsrandom-effects model, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) risk of bias assessment, Search October 2022, updated November 2023: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, 640 records; 22 studies in qualitative analysis, 12 in meta-analysis
  • Random-effects model
  • QUADAS-2 risk of bias assessment
  • Search October 2022, updated November 2023: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar
  • 640 records; 22 studies in qualitative analysis, 12 in meta-analysis

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Pooled diagnostic accuracy for OP diagnosis
GroupSensitivitySpecificity
AI models (overall)0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93)0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97)
Conventional algorithms0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94)0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97)
Deep convolutional neural networks0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95)0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96)

Sensitivity

AI models (overall)0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93)
Conventional algorithms0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94)
Deep convolutional neural networks0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95)

Specificity

AI models (overall)0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97)
Conventional algorithms0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97)
Deep convolutional neural networks0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96)

Original publication

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting osteoporosis using dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. Published 23 August 2024. doi:10.1007/s00198-024-07229-8

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.