Inflammatory myopathies

Analytical performance of commercial myositis-specific autoantibody tests evaluated against immunoprecipitation assays as a reference standard: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Semin Arthritis RheumPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Authors' conclusion

False-positive and false-negative results remain a significant challenge in the use of commercial MSA assays.

Study context

Population
Studies evaluating commercial myositis-specific autoantibody assays against immunoprecipitation (IP); PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus through July 202423 studies
Comparison
Commercial myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) assays vs IP assays as reference standard
Outcome
Pooled sensitivity and specificity of commercial MSA assays vs IP
Methodological detailshierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) model, QUADAS-2 quality assessment
  • Hierarchical SROC model
  • QUADAS-2 quality assessment

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

GroupPooled sensitivity, anti-MDA5Pooled sensitivity, anti-SAEPooled sensitivity, anti-PL-12Pooled sensitivity, anti-Jo-1 and anti-MDA5Pooled sensitivity, anti-Mi-2Pooled sensitivity, anti-NXP2Pooled sensitivity, anti-TIF1-γ
Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)95.7 %— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)— not stated in the abstract88.3 %87.2 %82.8 %67.4 %69.7 %63.8 %

Pooled sensitivity, anti-MDA5

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)95.7 %
Line blot assay (LBA)— not stated in the abstract

Pooled sensitivity, anti-SAE

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)88.3 %

Pooled sensitivity, anti-PL-12

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)87.2 %

Pooled sensitivity, anti-Jo-1 and anti-MDA5

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)82.8 %

Pooled sensitivity, anti-Mi-2

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)67.4 %

Pooled sensitivity, anti-NXP2

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)69.7 %

Pooled sensitivity, anti-TIF1-γ

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)— not stated in the abstract
Line blot assay (LBA)63.8 %

— not stated in the abstract

Pooled specificity across MSA assays
94.7 % to 99.3 %

Original publication

Analytical performance of commercial myositis-specific autoantibody tests evaluated against immunoprecipitation assays as a reference standard: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Published 27 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152858

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.