Vasculitis & polymyalgia rheumatica

Accuracy of the intima-media thickness by ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review

Semin Arthritis RheumPublished Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies

Authors' conclusion

The seven studies had considerable drawbacks due to biases across several domains.

Study context

Population
Patients with suspected GCA7 studies
Comparison
Quantitative intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement by ultrasound (US) vs qualitative judgement of the respective segments by US or MRI
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative IMT measurement by US for GCA
Methodological detailsQUADAS-2 quality assessment, 2786 records screened; last search June 3, 2024
  • QUADAS-2 quality assessment
  • 2786 records screened; last search June 3, 2024

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Diagnostic accuracy of IMT vs qualitative US or MRI judgement

Sensitivities

76 to 100 %

Specificities

85.7 to 100 %

Proposed IMT cut-offs, temporal artery

between 0.4 and 0.44 mm

Proposed IMT cut-offs, axillary artery

0.81 and 1.2 mm

Further pooled results

All studies have a high risk of bias in at least two QUADAS-2 domains (patient selection, lack of US blinding, index test part of reference standard)

Original publication

Accuracy of the intima-media thickness by ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Published 10 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152725

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.