Rheumatoid arthritis

The impact of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on patient costs: a cross-sectional study

Clin Exp RheumatolPublished Cross-sectional study

Main finding · COST score (lower = greater financial toxicity)Result — go to the resultDifference −1.82 points

Authors' conclusion

The use of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs is associated with increased financial toxicity among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Study context

Population
Patients with RA in the NinJa 2020 database (mean age 66.3 years; women 80.8%)
Participants
1,732 patients
Exposure
bDMARD or tsDMARD use vs no use
Outcome
Financial toxicity, 11-item COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)
Methodological detailsNinJa 2020 database, multivariable linear regression
  • NinJa 2020 database
  • Multivariable linear regression

Main finding

COST score (lower = greater financial toxicity)

Difference

−1.82 points

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

COST score (11-item; lower = greater financial toxicity), whole cohort

Mean COST score 25.3 (SD 6.6)

Co-payment for DMARDs and financial toxicity

Higher out-of-pocket expenses for DMARDs associated with increased financial toxicity; every JPY 10000 (USD 94.3) increase in co-payment corresponded to a decline in the COST score (points)
0.42

Original publication

The impact of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on patient costs: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. Published 28 December 2025. doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/o2xv28

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.