Rheumatoid arthritis

Patient and Rheumatologist Perspectives of the Patient Self-Administered Inflammatory Arthritis Detection Tool: Implementation Considerations, Potential Barriers, and Opportunities

J RheumatolPublished Mixed-methods study

Authors' conclusion

With targeted modifications and appropriate implementation mechanisms, the SAID tool has the potential to improve the quality of referrals, support triage decision making, and address current gaps in access to rheumatology care within evolving digital health systems.

Study context

Population
Patients and rheumatologists in the Patient SAID Study, British Columbia; perspectives on the SAID tool for primary-to-specialist referral92 patients · 3 rheumatologists
Participants
92 vs 3
Exposure
Patients vs Rheumatologists
  • Patientsn = 92
  • Rheumatologistsn = 3
Outcome
Patient and rheumatologist perspectives on the SAID tool
Methodological detailsmultimethods, patient survey, semistructured interviews
  • Multimethods
  • Patient survey
  • Semistructured interviews

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Patients finding the SAID tool easy to log into

85%

Patients finding the SAID tool easy to complete

82%

Patients believing it could help their general practitioner assess symptoms

76%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Patient and Rheumatologist Perspectives of the Patient Self-Administered Inflammatory Arthritis Detection Tool: Implementation Considerations, Potential Barriers, and Opportunities. J Rheumatol. Published 15 February 2026. doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0926

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.