Development and evaluation of shared decision-making tools in rheumatology: A scoping review
Study context
- Population
- Reports on development and/or evaluation of shared decision-making (SDM) tools among adults in rheumatology46 reports · 36 SDM tools
- Outcome
- Development and evaluation processes of SDM tools used in rheumatology
Methodological detailsPRISMA extension for scoping reviews, 2030 records screened
- PRISMA extension for scoping reviews
- 2030 records screened
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
- Reports included / SDM tools addressed (of 2030 records screened)
- 46 reports; 36 SDM tools
- Development basis: International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria (most common)
- 19/36, 53 %
- Development basis: Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF)
- 6/36, 16 %
- Development basis: Informed Medical Decision Foundation elements
- 3/36, 8 %
- Development basis: edutainment principles
- 2/36, 5.5 %
- Evaluation measure: Decisional Conflict Scale (most common)
- 18/46, 39 %
- Evaluation measures: acceptability and knowledge
- 7/46, 15 %
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Development and evaluation of shared decision-making tools in rheumatology: A scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Published 19 March 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →