Osteoarthritis

Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Extraction of Patient‐Reported Pain Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Using Large Language Models

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)Published Retrospective analysis

Authors' conclusion

LLMs accurately extract explicitly documented PROMs from clinical notes and reliably identify documentation artifacts. Inference from narrative documentation was less precise when notes lacked sufficient contextual information and detailed pain descriptions.

Study context

Population
Patients in a prospective Osteoarthritis (OA) registry with routine internal medicine and orthopedic clinic notespaired internal medicine and orthopedic clinic notes
Participants
163 patients
Index test or model
LLM-extracted or inferred pain scores vs abstracted scores and registry-collected pain scores (reference standard)
Target condition
pain scores on a 0-10 scale
Methodological detailspaired internal medicine and orthopedic clinic notes, prospective OA registry
  • Paired internal medicine and orthopedic clinic notes
  • Prospective OA registry

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Test or modelnValuep
IM notes132τ 0.76p < 0.0001
Orthopedic notes65τ 0.95p < 0.0001

n

IM notes132
Orthopedic notes65

Value

IM notesτ 0.76
Orthopedic notesτ 0.95

p

IM notesp < 0.0001
Orthopedic notesp < 0.0001

Further findings

OutcomeIM notesOrthopedic notes
LLM-based pain inference vs registry scores, notes without explicit pain scoresτ0.170.11
LLM-physician agreement
Within ±1 point54.2%-88.0%54.8%-70.5%
Within ±2 points66.7%-100%84.5%-97.7%

IM notes after excluding EMR-generated default zero scores

EMR-generated default zero scores identified by the LLM in IM notes
15
Agreement after excluding them (τ)
1.0
p
P < 0.0001

LLM-based pain inference vs registry scores, notes without explicit pain scores

Performed comparably to physician estimation

Original publication

Artificial Intelligence‐Driven Extraction of Patient‐Reported Pain Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Using Large Language Models. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Published 4 November 2026. doi:10.1002/acr.80197

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.