Vasculitis & polymyalgia rheumatica

A Delphi exercise informing the development of criteria to measure response to treatment in giant cell arteritis

Semin Arthritis RheumPublished Delphi consensus study

Authors' conclusion

Experts and patients identified 12 items considered important for measuring response to treatment in GCA.

Study context

Population
Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and health professionals with expertise in GCA, from 38 countries187 physicians · 85 patients
Outcome
Items rated critically important (scored 7-9 by ≥70% of health professionals and 70% of patients) for measuring response to treatment in GCA
Methodological details4-round, web-based, task force meeting, Task force (n = 32) meeting; 24 (75%) members participated
  • 4-round
  • Web-based
  • Task force meeting
  • Task force (n = 32) meeting; 24 (75%) members participated

Recommendations

As reported in the abstract

Items rated critically important
24
Items without consensus
40
New items proposed in round 1
13
Top-ranked item: headache (ranked highest by)
52%
Amaurosis fugax (ranked highest by)
10%
Jaw claudication (ranked highest by)
7%
Items selected for next phase
12

Original publication

A Delphi exercise informing the development of criteria to measure response to treatment in giant cell arteritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Published 8 April 2026. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2026.152975

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.